I have a question

Because we are awarding forfeit wins because Bruiser has been kicked out or removed himself from the league it would seem appropriate to award wins to everyone who played him thoughout the season. It does not seem fair for someone to get a freebie at this point versus someone getting a loss at an earlier point. It should be all or nothing. Either compete against his lineup or not. But it is not right that a portion of the league has to compete against him and a portion does not.

ALL OWNERS WERE TEXTED AND ASKED TO CALL GRAHAM ON WED NOV 17TH TO DISCUSS THIS MATTER. THE OWNERS THAT RESPONDED BACK WERE THE ONES THAT HAD INPUT IN MAKING THIS DECISION.
THIS IS WHY THE DECISON WENT AS IT DID:
TEAMS THAT ARE LEAGUE RUN, GRAHAM HAS TO TURN IN THEIR LINEUPS. THERE WAS TOO MUCH POSSIBILITY OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST WITH HIM DOING THAT. ANYTIME IN THE HISTORY OF THE LEAGUE, A TEAM BECAME LEAGUE RUN, THAT TEAM HAS BEEN INELIGIBLE FOR HEAD TO HEAD WINS.
TEAMS THAT PLAYED BR OR TS WHEN THEY HAD ACTIVE OWNERS TRYING TO WIN WERE PLAYED AGAINST A REAL OPPONNENT. IM ( GRAHAM ) TIRED OF THE HATRED THAT IVE BEEN GETTING AT TIMES, SO I DIDNT WANT THE RESPONSIBILITY OF TURNING IN LINEUPS AGAINST MYSELF OR TEAMS IM PLAYING OR MY RIVALS ARE PLAYING IN HEAD TO HEAD MATCHUPS.

WE ALSO DECIDED THAT SINCE THERE ARE 5 ACTIVE TEAMS IN ONE DIVISION AND 3 ACTIVE TEAMS IN THE OTHER DIVISION. SINCE THE TOP 4 IN EACH DIVISION MAKE THE PLAYOFFS, WHOEVER GETS 1ST IN THE DIVISION WITH 5 TEAMS GETS TO CHOOSE WHICH DIVISION THEY WANT TO BE THE #1 SEED IN FOR THE PLAYOFFS.



JUST FOR CLARIFICATION, BRUISERS QUIT, HE WAS NEVER ASKED TO LEAVE OR THROWN OUT.